Thad Komorowski, David Gerstein, and Steve Stanchfield watching polished cartoons |
The
first movie I watched was The Last Man on Earth. This is a quaint
sci-fi story set in the future which
gets lots of giggles in the beginning but overstays its welcome. If you
enjoyed Just Imagine, you’ll love this. Elmer is a man with eyes for
only one girl, but she cannot see his merit and no one else can seem to
either. Her decisive rejection of him pushes
him away so strongly that he becomes a hermit in the
forest, and it is a good thing for him because an outbreak of
“masculitis”, a disease which eradicates
males over 14 years old, gives
him the coveted spot of the last man on earth. Hundreds
of sex-starved women in outrageous and shockingly risqué dresses (who
are they flaunting their bodies for?) impatiently wait for the pre-teen
boys to come of age, searching the globe for any sign of a surviving
man. They find Elmer and bring him back to civilization
only to be auctioned off to the highest bidder, then confiscated by the
government and given away to the winner of a boxing match. The movie is
only 70 minutes long and the beginning is tightly edited but it begins
to peter out at the end once the novelty
wears off. With that being said, the novelty is pretty fun. Compare the
short hoop skirts (which when pressed against, such as when dancing,
flips up to completely expose a pair of bloomers) with the more demure
and utilitarian styles of the actual 1940s.
Imagine the endless jokes that could arise from such a story, many of
which are alluded to in the discreet way that movies restricted by
censorship regulations cleverly did. I recently bought a book called Mr.
Adam published in the 1940s with a similar plot
and I’m curious to read it and compare it with this film.
Buying books from Doug Swarthout, a total of 18 |
Martin Grams hard at work |
Meeting Leonard Maltin with my friend Keaton |
The Return of Peter Grimm was based on a story by David Belasco, so of course it is pure melodrama. I saw the later talkie version with Lionel Barrymore years ago and enjoyed it. It is comparable to this version which moved quickly and had a good cast, including Janet Gaynor who is always pleasant.
I
was in the theater for Me and the Boys but the projectionists were
having trouble with the digital presentation
(there was no sound) so they ended up moving it to after the Hal Roach
Show. Since my friend needed a ride over to the hotel I left before they
screened it. This was the first of many digital mishaps that plagued
the show.
Little Wheezer taunting Jackie in Spanish |
Meeting Richard W. Bann |
The Vitagraph Varieties presentation which was laid out in the program book was different than what they showed
because of another problem with the digital medium. I do not recall which films they did show, but none of the four stood out as being particularly good.
When
I saw in the opening credits of The Second Floor Mystery that the movie
was based on The Agony Column
by Derr Earl Biggers, I got even more excited than I previously was to
see this early Loretta Young film. I loved the book so much I read it in
one day but I didn’t realize there was a film version, so I was
naturally very disappointed when about 10-15 minutes
into the movie it shut off and restarted from the beginning. The
projectionist tried several times to fast-forward it back to the correct
moment, but it shut off again. By this time I was frustrated and since
my friends were waiting for me to go to dinner,
I decided to leave. They did show the rest of the movie and I heard it
was quite good, so I will try to track down a copy to watch at home.
Gary Sloan running movies after hours |
I
love Harold Lloyd features. Because of the kind of everyman character
he played and the city locations, his
movies captured a slice of history that costume dramas and horror
movies never did. Match that with top-notch comedy and you’ve got the
makings for a wonderful movie, and the silent version of Welcome Danger
is no exception. Annette D'Agostino Lloyd introduced the
movie and asked the crowd who had watched the sound version. Then she
asked how many liked it, and the amount of raised hands significantly
decreased. She laughed and promised the silent version was vastly
superior, and judging by audience reaction, she was right. The images were polished, the comedy was truly funny and the story was entertaining. This was definitely
the best feature I saw at Cinefest. Now I want to give the talkie version a shot to see how it compares.
With El Brendel expert Louie Despres |
Tess
of the Storm Country was introduced by a representative who worked on the restoration and his enthusiasm and sense
of humor were refreshing, though
his talk went a bit longer than was probably appropriate considering
how delayed the schedule already was. To make matters worse, the digital
presentation was in the wrong aspect ratio, so after 5 or 10 minutes of
watching, they stopped the movie and said
they would show it at a later time. Fortunately, I didn't miss the re-screening, although the movie was disappointing overall. Die-hard Mary Pickford fans like me will find contrasting this with the 1922 remake entertaining, but the later version is vastly superior. This 1914 original suffers from antiquated film making including heavy use of title cards to advance the story and lots of full length shots of the actors which encouraged more stagy acting from the auxiliary cast.
The final thing I watched in the screening room was Dick Bann's Hal Roach Show part two, and it was disappointing. The first short was an overly lengthy drama about a farmer who submits an autobiographical story to a studio and wins a trip to Hollywood only to be cast in the movie because of his prowess milking cows. It would have been better if it had been edited a bit more, but as it stands it felt like a short/feature hybrid. Next came an episode of the Gale Storm show where Gale and Zasu Pitts sneak away from quarantine on a cruise ship to visit the Hal Roach studios where they get mixed up in a doppelganger case with Boris Karloff. It was entertaining enough but nothing special.
Reunion with the Kukowskis: Keaton, Sharon, Steve & David |
So what did I learn? Digital may be the way of the future, but
sometimes the old-fashioned way is best. Since
I do not have a projector of my own, hearing the whirr of real film
running through the machine is something I associate with film
conventions and taking that away detracts a bit from the experience.
Let me say I had a
great time, as I knew I would. I met people in person who I had only
known online, saw familiar faces, and made new friends. Truly it is the
people who make conventions worthwhile, which was brought home recently
for me with the deaths of two convention regulars. It is true that the
films are what bring us together and the organizers do a great job of
offering rare attractions, but just as we savor the films we should also
savor the moments together because they are fleeting.
I hope the predictions that conventions will become a thing of the past are wrong, and that Cinefest attendees will still gather together. For those who have attended Cinefest but never Cinevent, let me encourage you to check it out. They are very similar in setup and crowd, although Cinevent has more dealers and a wider range of films. I consider my Cinefest trip to be the appetizer to the meal, and what a satisfying meal it is!
With Adam Williams |
I hope the predictions that conventions will become a thing of the past are wrong, and that Cinefest attendees will still gather together. For those who have attended Cinefest but never Cinevent, let me encourage you to check it out. They are very similar in setup and crowd, although Cinevent has more dealers and a wider range of films. I consider my Cinefest trip to be the appetizer to the meal, and what a satisfying meal it is!